I think I've got our president figured out. You probably will too before I reach the conclusion. See what these points mean to you.
One: George the lesser's fiscal policy is to concentrate money in the hands of the wealthy, so that it may trickle down to the rest of us. The theory is that if the wealthy have more of the nation's money, they will vastly increase their purchases of consumer goods, which will stimulate the economy. Whereas if the money goes to anyone else, uh? what? They won't spend it, I guess. Turn it into papier mache or something. Maybe waste it on food and consumer goods, as the poor are wont to do, which won't stimulate the economy.
Two: the president's domestic policy is to grant big business whatever it wants. The theory is that business will produce wealth, which will ultimately improve everyone's lot, and that business will be responsible enough to take care of any problems it creates. That's why it's perfectly all right to drill for oil in national preserves: oil companies will be very careful to use only natural-looking, non-pollutive derricks.
Three: on the foreign scene, the essence of George's policy is the "charm offensive." By substituting warmth and general affability for actual substantive policy, he avoids worrying over all those tricky details. Surely foreign leaders will happily dispose of their own agenda for someone as likeable as George. Oh, not including evil empires, obviously.
Four: for those evil empires, George wants a high-tech anti-missile shield. Observant military theorists note that such a defense will not deter great powers, who don't really want to get into a nuclear exchange, and wouldn't stop them if they did, since the shield can't be entirely effective, and only a few nukes would need to get through to destroy the country. Also, it won't stop rogue states, which, by definition, act irrationally and are more likely to use suitcase bombs, anyway, since they can't afford ICBMs. Never mind; the US can win any arms race. That'll show 'em.
Five: the president is entitled to short work days. Long hours tax his attention span, so, according to an account I found in the Economist, he works 10-noon and 1:30-4, a four-and-a-half hour day, not counting a brief after-lunch nap.
Starting to sound familiar? You've seen it all before, perhaps with slightly different labels. Supply-side economics. The environment delegated to James Watt. Teflon presidency. SDI/Star Wars. Oval office naps. Bush either thinks he's Reagan, or wants very, very badly to be.
Well, there we go again.